Uneekor Eye Mini Launch Monitor Review


Go down any range at a high level professional tour event, and watch the players. None of them are alone. Besides their coaches and caddies, right behind them or across from them is a launch monitor, most likely an orange Trackman (behind) or one that works face-on like the GCQuad by Foresight Sports.

For most regular golfers, those are just too darn expensive. An indoor/outdoor Trackman 4 runs about $25,000; The GCQuad is around $15,000. Fortunately, there’s a pretty good selection of affordable launch monitors, many of them under $1,000, which will do the trick for everyday players. But while most of these are pretty darn good, they still don’t really compare to the quality and precision of the best launch monitors that run at $15,000 or higher.

Uneekor Eye Mini Launch Monitor

(Image credit: Mike Bailey)

This is where the Eye Mini, the first portable launch monitor from Uneeker, comes in. It’s designed to not only compete with the ones used on tour, but attract serious amateurs and perhaps more modest pros who have to shell out their own money for a lunch monitor. At $4,500, Uneekor, a Korean company (known for its overhead indoor units) with U.S. headquarters in Irvine, Calif., will tell you that the Eye Mini has the same technology as the GCQuad. Uneekor is also trying to build a tour presence with the Eye Mini. Cameron Champ uses one, and Muni “Lily” He and Hyo Joo Kim of LPGA Tour are also Eye Mini owners.

The Eye Mini, in fact, looks much like the GCQuad and uses similar technology. While many of them, including Trackman, employ radar to track balls, the Eye Mini, like the GCQuad, has two high-speed cameras that simply track the ball and club within a few feet.

Uneekor Eye Mini Launch Monitor

(Image credit: mike bailey)

The advantage is that it can instantaneously record data without waiting for the ball to land or even reach its apex. For example, when I tested the Eye Mini indoors against the Foresight Sports GCHawk, I would look to the Eye Mini first for my numbers, which were displayed pretty much immediately after impact. That’s a nice trait, whether you are indoors or outdoors. I also found the data to be very close to the GCHawk. The variances were very small, which hasn’t always been the case with the under $1,000 units I’ve tested.



Source link

Previous articleQualcomm’s Snapdragon X Elite chips promise major PC performance
Next articleBitcoin bulls fight to hold $34K as CME BTC open interest surpasses 100K