Apple’s C1 chip holds its own against Qualcomm’s modems


Apple’s C1 modem — image credit: Apple



While much has been written throughout the years about Apple’s cellular modem and how it would stack up versus Qualcomm, Apple’s C1 modem in the iPhone 16e is no slouch when it comes to actual internet speeds.

The iPhone 16e is the first of Apple’s phones to employ its in-house, custom C1 modem. Previously, Apple had employed chips created by Qualcomm, including those in the iPhone 16 line.

Ookla, a company known for measuring internet performance metrics, has offered up some data that shows how Apple’s iPhone 16e is fairing against its higher-end brethren. In most real-world cases, Apple’s modem is on top.

When it comes to worst-case speeds, the iPhone 16e handily outperformed the iPhone 16. For example, T-Mobile users in some of the worst served areas of the network saw download speeds of 57Mbps, while the iPhone 16 saw 27Mbps.

10th percentile performance across networks | Image credit: Ookla
10th percentile performance across networks | Image credit: Ookla

The iPhone 16 lineup, however, has better top-end performance, at least in the ideal scenarios. On T-Mobile, the users with the best overall connectivity and network exposure saw download speeds averaging nearly 890Mbps on the iPhone 16, versus 627Mbps on the iPhone 16e.

Bar chart comparing iPhone 16 and iPhone 16e download speeds across AT&T, T-Mobile, and Verizon, showing iPhone 16 performs better in best case scenarios.
iPhone 16 sees faster speeds in best case scenarios | Image credit: Ookla

Interestingly enough, despite the fact that the Qualcomm modem supports mmWave, that doesn’t seem to be the deciding factor. Even though Apple’s C1 modem does not support mmWave, the iPhone 16e still outperformed the iPhone 16 in most scenarios.

On T-Mobile, for example, the iPhone 16e averaged about 265Mbps down, while the iPhone 16 averaged around 357Mbps down. However, the iPhone 16e still outperformed the iPhone 16 on Verizon and AT&T’s networks.

Bar chart comparing median download speeds of iPhone 16e and iPhone 16 on AT&T, T-Mobile, and Verizon, showing varying performance across carriers.
The iPhone 16e outperforms the iPhone 16 in most scenarios | Image credit: Ookla

Despite buildouts continuing, mmWave penetration and service areas are low in the US, and lower still everywhere else. Many countries have no mmWave deployment at all.

For most people, on most networks, most of the time, the iPhone 16e is going to be a fair bit faster than the iPhone 16 lineup. There are situations, like outside, downtown in a large metropolitan area with a robust mmWave deployment, on an uncongested network where the iPhone 16 will win.

Ultimately, which network you use, coupled with when and where you use it, will likely influence your top speeds more than the iPhone model you have.

As Ookla points out, on those on T-Mobile’s networks, regardless of phone model, saw higher speeds across the board, whether it be peak performance or the worst-case scenario. Verizon users typically skewed lower than the other two networks.



Source link

Previous articleBitcoin Price Watch: Bulls Aim for $90K, but Resistance Stands in the Way – Bitcoin.com News