Efficacy of psychosocial interventions for Autism spectrum disorder: an umbrella review


  • American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596 2013.

  • Ayres M, Parr JR, Rodgers J, Mason D, Avery L, Flynn D. A systematic review of quality of life of adults on the autism spectrum. Autism. 2018;22:774–83.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wong C, Odom SL, Hume KA, Cox AW, Fettig A, Kucharczyk S, et al. Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with autism spectrum disorder: A comprehensive review. J Autism Developmental Disord. 2015;45:1951–66.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zwaigenbaum L, Bauman ML, Choueiri R, Kasari C, Carter A, Granpeesheh D, et al. Early intervention for children with autism spectrum disorder under 3 years of age: recommendations for practice and research. Pediatrics. 2015;136:S60–81.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • McCormack G, Dillon AC, Healy O, Walsh C, Lydon S. Primary care physicians’ knowledge of autism and evidence-based interventions for autism: a systematic review. J Autism Developmental Disord. 2020;7:226–41.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Höfer J, Hoffmann F, Kamp-Becker I, Küpper C, Poustka L, Roepke S, et al. Complementary and alternative medicine use in adults with autism spectrum disorder in Germany: results from a multi-center survey. BMC Psychiatry. 2019;19:1–8.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • James S, Stevenson SW, Silove N, Williams K. Chelation for autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Cochrane Database of Systematic Rev. 2015;5:CD010766.

  • Seida JK, Ospina MB, Karkhaneh M, Hartling L, Smith V, Clark B. Systematic reviews of psychosocial interventions for autism: an umbrella review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2009;51:95–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.03211.x.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Green J, Garg S. Annual Research Review: The state of autism intervention science: progress, target psychological and biological mechanisms and future prospects. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2018;59:424–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12892.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Skinner BF (1953). Science and human behavior. New-York: Macmillan.

  • Lovaas OI. Behavioral treatment and normal educational and intellectual functioning in young autistic children. J Consulting Clin Psychol. 1987;55:3–9.

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • McEachin JJ, Smith T, Lovaas OI. Long-term outcome for children with autism who received early intensive behavioral treatment. Am J Ment Retardation. 1993;97:359–72.

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Green VA, Pituch KA, Itchon J, Choi A, O’Reilly M, Sigafoos J. Internet survey of treatments used by parents of children with autism. Res Dev Disabil. 2006;27:70–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2004.12.002.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Green J, Charman T, McConachie H, Aldred C, Slonims V, Howlin P. et al. Parent-mediated communication-focused treatment in children with autism (PACT): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;375:2152–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60587-9.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pickles A, Le Couteur A, Leadbitter K, Salomone E, Cole-Fletcher R, Tobin H. et al. Parent-mediated social communication therapy for young children with autism (PACT): long-term follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;388:2501–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31229-6.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schreibman L, Dawson G, Stahmer AC, Landa R, Rogers SJ, McGee GG, et al. Naturalistic developmental behavioral interventions: Empirically validated treatments for autism spectrum disorder. J Autism Developmental Disord. 2015;45:2411–28.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kasari C, Freeman S, Paparella T. Joint attention and symbolic play in young children with autism: a randomized controlled intervention study. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2006;47:611–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01567.x.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Reichow B, Steiner AM, Volkmar F. Social skills groups for people aged 6 to 21 with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;7:CD008511. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008511.pub2.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hofmann SG, Asnaani A, Vonk IJ, Sawyer AT, Fang A. The efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy: a review of meta-analyses. Cogn Ther Res. 2012;36:427–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-012-9476-1.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • White SW, Albano AM, Johnson CR, Kasari C, Ollendick T, Klin A, et al. Development of a cognitive-behavioral intervention program to treat anxiety and social deficits in teens with high-functioning autism. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2010;13:77–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-009-0062-3.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mesibov GB, Shea V, Schopler E. The TEACCH approach to autism spectrum disorders. Springer Science & Business Media, 2005.

  • Virues-Ortega J, Julio FM, Pastor-Barriuso R. The TEACCH program for children and adults with autism: a meta-analysis of intervention studies. Clin Psychol Rev. 2013;33:940–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2013.07.005.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Oono IP, Honey EJ, McConachie H. Parent-mediated early intervention for young children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;4:CD009774. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009774.pub2.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Grynszpan O, Weiss PL, Perez-Diaz F, Gal E. Innovative technology-based interventions for autism spectrum disorders: a meta-analysis. Autism. 2014;18:346–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361313476767.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tenny S, Varacallo M. Evidence based medicine (EBM). Treasure Island: StatPearls Publishing, 2018.

  • Ioannidis JP. The mass production of redundant, misleading, and conflicted systematic reviews and meta‐analyses. Milbank Q. 2016;94:485–514.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Eldevik S, Hastings RP, Hughes JC, Jahr E, Eikeseth S, Cross S. Meta-analysis of early intensive behavioral intervention for children with autism. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2009;38:439–50.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Spreckley M, Boyd R. Efficacy of applied behavioral intervention in preschool children with autism for improving cognitive, language, and adaptive behavior: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pediatrics. 2009;154:338–44.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ioannidis JP. Integration of evidence from multiple meta-analyses: a primer on umbrella reviews, treatment networks and multiple treatments meta-analyses. Cmaj. 2009;181:488–93.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ioannidis JP. Next-generation systematic reviews: prospective meta-analysis, individual-level data, networks and umbrella reviews. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51:1456–8.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fusar-Poli P, Radua J. Ten simple rules for conducting umbrella reviews. Evid-based Ment Health. 2018;21:95–100.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Becker LA, Oxman AD Chapter 22: Overviews of reviews. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors), Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011.

  • Grant N, Rodger S, Hoffmann T. Evaluation of autism‐related health information on the Web. J Appl Res Intellect Disabilities. 2014;28:276–82.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Grant N, Rodger S, Hoffmann T. Intervention decision‐making processes and information preferences of parents of children with autism spectrum disorders. Child: Care, Health Dev. 2016;42:125–34.

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Higgins JP, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al. (Eds.). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. John Wiley & Sons. 2019.

  • Wong SSL, Wilczynski NL, Haynes RB. Optimal CINAHL search strategies for identifying therapy studies and review articles. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2006;38:194–9.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Eady AM, Wilczynski NL, Haynes RB, Hedges Team. PsycINFO search strategies identified methodologically sound therapy studies and review articles for use by clinicians and researchers. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61:34–40.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wilczynski NL, Marks S, Haynes RB. Search strategies for identifying qualitative studies in CINAHL. Qualitative Health Res. 2007;17:705–10.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Montori VM, Wilczynski NL, Morgan D, Haynes RB. Optimal search strategies for retrieving systematic reviews from Medline: analytical survey. BMJ. 2005;330:68.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wilczynski NL, Haynes RB, Hedges Team. EMBASE search strategies achieved high sensitivity and specificity for retrieving methodologically sound systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:29–33.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Odom SL, Collet-Klingenberg L, Rogers SJ, Hatton DD. Evidence-based practices in interventions for children and youth with autism spectrum disorders. Preventing Sch Fail: Alternative Educ Child youth. 2010;54:275–82.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sandbank M, Bottema-Beutel K, Crowley S, Cassidy M, Dunham K, Feldman JI, et al. Project AIM: autism intervention meta-analysis for studies of young children. Psychol Bull. 2020;146:1–29. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000215.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, Thuku M, Hamel C, Moran J, et al. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ. 2017;358:j4008.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gosling CJ, Solanes A, Fusar-Poli P, Radua J. metaumbrella: An R Package for Conducting Umbrella Reviews. R package version 1.0.3. [Accessed 30.05.2022] https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=metaumbrella.

  • Radua J, Ramella‐Cravaro V, Ioannidis JP, Reichenberg A, Phiphopthatsanee N, Amir T, et al. What causes psychosis? An umbrella review of risk and protective factors. World Psychiatry. 2018;17:49–66.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kim JY, Son MJ, Son CY, Radua J, Eisenhut M, Gressier F, et al. Environmental risk factors and biomarkers for autism spectrum disorder: an umbrella review of the evidence. Lancet Psychiatry. 2019;6:590–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30181-6.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JP, Rothstein HR. Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons. 2009.

  • Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315:629–34.

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sterne JAC, Egger M. Regression methods to detect publication and other bias in meta-analysis. In: Rothstein HR, Sutton AJ, and Borenstein M, editors. Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments. John Wiley & Sons, 2005, p. 100–10.

  • Kim JY, Son MJ, Son CY, Radua J, Eisenhut M, Gressier F, et al. Environmental risk factors and biomarkers for autism spectrum disorder: an umbrella review of the evidence. Lancet Psychiatry. 2019;6:590–600.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dragioti E, Solmi M, Favaro A, Fusar-Poli P, Dazzan P, Thompson T, et al. Association of antidepressant use with adverse health outcomes: a systematic umbrella review. JAMA Psychiatry. 2019;76:1241–55.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Salazar de Pablo G, Solmi M, Vaquerizo-Serrano J, Radua J, Passina A, Mosillo P, et al. Primary prevention of depression: An umbrella review of controlled interventions. J Affect Disord. 2021;294:957–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.07.101.

  • Pollock A, Farmer SE, Brady MC, Langhorne P, Mead GE, Mehrholz J, et al. An algorithm was developed to assign GRADE levels of evidence to comparisons within systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;70:106–10.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sallows GO, Graupner TD. Intensive behavioral treatment for children with autism: four-year outcome and predictors. Am J Ment Retard. 2005;110:417–38. https://doi.org/10.1352/0895-8017(2005)110[417:IBTFCW]2.0.CO;2.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tiede G, Walton KM. Meta-analysis of naturalistic developmental behavioral interventions for young children with autism spectrum disorder. Autism. 2019;23:2080–95.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Crank JE, Sandbank M, Dunham K, Crowley S, Bottema‐Beutel K, Feldman J, et al. Understanding the effects of naturalistic developmental behavioral interventions: a project AIM meta‐analysis. Autism Res. 2021;14:817–34.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Grzadzinski R, Carr T, Colombi C, McGuire K, Dufek S, Pickles A, et al. Measuring changes in social communication behaviors: Preliminary Development of the Brief Observation of Social Communication Change (BOSCC). J Autism Dev Disord. 2016;46:2464–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-016-2782-9.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fortea L, Tortella-Feliu M, Juaneda-Seguí A, De la Peña-Arteaga V, Chavarría-Elizondo P, Prat-Torres L, et al. Development and Validation of a Smartphone-Based App for the Longitudinal Assessment of Anxiety in Daily Life Assessment. 2021;10731911211065166. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911211065166.

  • Cuijpers P, Karyotaki E, Ebert D, & Harrer M [Internet]. Meta-Analytic Database [Accessed 30.05.2022]. Available from: https://evidencebasedpsychotherapies.shinyapps.io/metapsy/.

  • Esteves SC, Majzoub A, Agarwal A. The problem of mixing ‘apples and oranges’ in meta-analytic studies. Transl Androl Urol. 2017;6:S412–3.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cooper NJ, Jones DR, Sutton AJ. The use of systematic reviews when designing studies. Clin Trials Lond Engl. 2005;2:260–4.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jones AP, Conroy E, Williamson PR, Clarke M, Gamble C. The use of systematic reviews in the planning, design and conduct of randomised trials: a retrospective cohort of NIHR HTA funded trials. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:50. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-50.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Clark T, Berger U, Mansmann U. Sample size determinations in original research protocols for randomised clinical trials submitted to UK research ethics committees: review. BMJ. 2013;346:f1135.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Goudie AC, Sutton AJ, Jones DR, Donald A. Empirical assessment suggests that existing evidence could be used more fully in designing randomized controlled trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:983–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.01.022.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Provenzani U, Fusar-Poli L, Brondino N, Damiani S, Vercesi M, Meyer N, et al. What are we targeting when we treat autism spectrum disorder? A systematic review of 406 clinical trials. Autism. 2020;24:274–84.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336:924–6.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Brożek JL, Akl EA, Compalati E, Kreis J, Terracciano L, Fiocchi A, et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines part 3 of 3. The GRADE approach to developing recommendations. Allergy. 2011;66:588–95.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dinu M, Pagliai G, Casini A, Sofi F. Mediterranean diet and multiple health outcomes: an umbrella review of meta-analyses of observational studies and randomised trials. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2018;72:30–43.

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dinu M, Pagliai G, Angelino D, Rosi A, Dall’Asta M, Bresciani L, et al. Effects of popular diets on anthropometric and cardiometabolic parameters: an umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. Adv Nutr. 2020;11:815–33.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pollock A, Farmer SE, Brady MC, Langhorne P, Mead GE, Mehrholz J, et al. Interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2014:CD010820. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010820.pub2.

  • Wang SY, Cui Y, Parrila R. Examining the effectiveness of peer-mediated and video-modeling social skills interventions for children with autism spectrum disorders: a meta-analysis in single-case research using HLM. Res Autism Spectr Discord. 2011;5:562–9.



  • Source link