Google is being sued in Texas over how it collects and uses personally identifiable data.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has submitted a lawsuit in which he claims the company did not adequately ask users in the state for consent for the collection and use of both voice and facial information.
He alleges that through these actions, Google has broken the state’s laws on biometric data, and has done so several times since 2015.
Google services and data privacy
According to Paxton, Google Photos, Google Assistant, and the company’s Nest product series all collect data that it uses to improve its artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms.
Google, naturally, says Paxton has it all wrong.
“AG Paxton is once again mischaracterizing our products in another breathless lawsuit,” Google spokesperson José Castañeda said in a statement.
“For example, Google Photos helps you organize pictures of people, by grouping similar faces, so you can easily find old photos. Of course, this is only visible to you and you can easily turn off this feature if you choose and we do not use photos or videos in Google Photos for advertising purposes.”
“The same is true for Voice Match and Face Match on Nest Hub Max, which are off-by-default features that give users the option to let Google Assistant recognize their voice or face to show their information. We will set the record straight in court.”
If you’re getting the sense that Google sounds just a bit fed up with Paxton, you’re may not be far off. Paxton has been chasing Google numerous times now.
The Texas attorney general is leading a “coalition of states” suing Google on antitrust grounds, claiming it illegally monopolized the online advertising technology market.
In September 2022, Paxton’s claim that Facebook and Google colluded with each other over an online advertising deal was thrown out of court on the grounds that the companies only pursued their own interests.
In the same ruling, however, the antitrust coalition case was allowed to continue, so it’s entirely possible that this latest data privacy case could stick too.
Via: CNBC (opens in new tab)
