To construct a hypothetical stadium-free version of, say, Dallas, where the stadium was open, the team looked for nearby counties with similar preseason patterns of covid-19 and used data from them to calculate the number of cases this “synthetic” county would have had through the season. Then they compared case counts in each synthetic county with those in the nearby “stadium counties” (those supplying more than 10% of fans), which included 13 stadiums that were closed and 16 that stayed open with reduced capacity and measures such as masking and distanced seating.
In all cases, they found similar trajectories of infection in stadium counties and synthetic counties. (By contrast, their method did pick up a case increase in the county that hosted the Sturgis Motorcycle Rally.) Some stadium counties’ case counts were actually lower than their synthetic counterparts’—perhaps, says study author Anette “Peko” Hosoi, because fans would have gathered indoors to watch the games if the stadiums had been off-limits. “Opening the stadium under those circumstances would have been beneficial to the community because it makes people go outside,” she says.
The overall covid situation is very different today, with vaccines available but more transmissible variants circulating rapidly. Still, the results “show that the measures adopted by the NFL were effective in safely opening stadiums,” says Hosoi. “If case counts start to rise again, we know what to do: mask people, put them outside, and distance them from each other.”
