In recent weeks among the usual to and fro of cryptocurrency proponents and sceptics, signs of real pushback from users to companies’ plans have had a real impact. Image: Ubisoft
The big lesson here is if users want to impact a company’s direction, hitting them in the hip pocket works.
The banner block thus far has been last month’s pause by Discord on plans to integrate crypto wallets into its product, after users started cancelling subscriptions en masse.
At the time of writing, another pair of pushback events are taking place.
Kickstarter’s plan to essentially refactor its core functionality on a distributed blockchain protocol, for seemingly no good reason other than it can, has not been entirely well-received, with comic, video game, and music creators taking to social media to decry the move.
One webcomic studio, Hiveworks, has said it would turn its back on the crowdfunding platform if it were to switch to blockchain.
“As a company, we are strongly against blockchain, including its use as a facilitating token for crowdfunding artistic projects, most prominently in the form of NFTs. It’s hard to view Kickstarter’s pivot to blockchain as something that will truly help Kickstarter in its main mission — helping projects come to life,” the studio said.
See also: Volcano-powered Bitcoin City could be Bond villainy or the state of play in 2021
“If Kickstarter decides to move forward with blockchain we’ll be shifting to an in-house pre-order system as per creator preferences, which will be rolled out paired with the next planned Kickstarters we have already scheduled.”
The other pushback is happening against Ubisoft, which decided it wanted to add NFTs to its games, under the name Quartz.
On Thursday, Kotaku reported the company had delisted its Quartz announcement vid on YouTube after it gained a 1 to 24 like-to dislike-ratio.
The terms of service for Quartz are a thing of absolute beauty.
Under section 7.3, Ubisoft says any NFTs, called Digits, will be transacted on the Tezos blockchain — which is nascent and Ubisoft has zero control of — before rattling off the following warning:
Therefore, you are informed that:
Ubisoft has no ability to reverse or cancel transactions,Ubisoft has no liability to you or to any third-party for any claims or damages that may arise as a result of any use of the Tezos blockchain network, payments or transactions you engage in, including but not limited to (a) any loss, damages or claims arising from any malfunction, unintended function or unexpected functioning of the Tezos blockchain network that may cause your Digits to malfunction or function in an unexpected or unintended manner; or (b) any bugs or vulnerabilities in the smart contracts or their functioning.the Tezos blockchain network may be subject to specific weaknesses, which make them possibly targets for specific cybersecurity threats,Ubisoft has no liability in the risks implied by the use of this new technology, and you are solely responsible for secure storage of private keys for your crypto-wallet.
For any TV current affairs shows looking for a cheap story to run over the holiday period, find the poor parent who has learned their kid has borrowed their credit card and turned into a Ghost Recon NFT whale one night while having no recourse for that transaction to be reversed.
Other than being able to suck more money out of its very milked user base, there does not appear to be a single positive feature from the move that its current skin and micro-transaction economy, and its database, does not already handle.
During the past week, the governments of both the United States and Australia have begun to think about creating a proverbial posse to go after the crypto-cowboy ecosystem.
Oops: Losses from BitMart breach reach $200 million
News Highlights Business
- Not One More Token: Could Backlash Fuel Ways To Get Crypto-Cowboys On Their Heel?
- Check all news and articles from the Business news updates.
