SEC Disapproves BZX’s Proposal To List Wise Origin Bitcoin Trust – Technology



    United States:

    SEC Disapproves BZX’s Proposal To List Wise Origin Bitcoin Trust


    To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

    The SEC disapproved the proposed rule change by
    Cboe BZX (“BZX”) to list and trade shares of the Wise
    Origin Bitcoin Trust under BZX Rule 14.11(e)(4)
    (“Commodity-Based Trust Shares”). The SEC concluded that
    BZX has not met its burden to demonstrate that its proposal is
    consistent with requirements to prevent fraudulent or manipulative
    acts.

    BZX argued that a variety of means are available to prevent
    fraudulent and manipulative practices. BZX asserted that, due to
    slow transaction speeds and the capital needed to manipulate the
    prices, such manipulation is challenging and unlikely. The SEC
    disagreed, saying the record does not support such claims. The SEC
    also asserted that BZX failed to contest the presence of other
    sources of fraud and manipulation raised by the Commission in
    previous orders.

    Commentary

    Steven Lofchie

    As a practical matter, given the size of the Bitcoin market, the
    number of sophisticated traders who watch that market, and the
    absence of inside information, the market for Bitcoin is inherently
    much less susceptible to manipulation than the market for many
    other securities. It seems that SEC Chair Gary Gensler simply does
    not want to approve the listing of a Bitcoin exchange-traded fund
    (“ETF”). It is not likely that some new surveillance tool
    is going to change his decision. Change will have to come through
    some exogenous event, such as political or public pressure.

    The SEC’s unwillingness to approve for listing even a
    plain-vanilla Bitcoin ETF is also evidence as to why no digital
    asset entrepreneur is likely to visit the SEC and request approval
    for any regulatory exemption or modification. There is no reason to
    believe that there is any possibility of a favorable
    action. See generally Cabinet Commentary: The Securities Law Treatment
    of Utility Tokens
    .

    The content of this article is intended to provide a general
    guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
    about your specific circumstances.

    POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Technology from United States



    Source link

    Previous articleApple will charge 27% commission for purchases made using alternative payment systems in the Netherlands
    Next articleSpotify vs Apple Music vs Tidal — Who pays artists more?