This is your yearly reminder that Xbox naming schemes are bad, and Microsoft should feel bad


It’s 2001, and you’re sitting outside Gamestop for some new-fangled device. You’re the only one in your friend group who decided they’re wild enough to get an Xbox over the Nintendo Gamecube that releases only a few days later. Basically, you’re nuts, and you have no friends. Well, you have one if you manage to make it to the Toys R’ Us store opening, where Bill Gates hands them out himself!

You’ve heard good things about this Halo game, but you’re really not sure what to expect. Your internet is too slow to watch any videos; all you have to go off of is the Game Informer issue from that month, which pitted the Xbox against the Gamecube as well. Online gameplay? You’re 12; while you’re technically not supposed to be playing online, the online gameplay of Xbox Online will be shaping you for years to come.

The success of Xbox led to the creation of the Xbox 360. It was named as such because they wanted to convey the fully overhauled gaming experience or 360 degrees of entertainment. While the Xbox 2 would have been a great choice as well, this was supposedly dropped as they didn’t want an Xbox 2 competing against the PlayStation 3. They felt it would communicate the idea that Xbox was a generation behind.

Person buying an original Xbox from Bill Gates

The green screen text on the monitor in the back really dates the photo. (Image credit: Microsoft)

Those weren’t the only names used during Microsoft’s second-generation console. We got the Xbox 360, Xbox 360 Core, Xbox 360 Arcade, Xbox 360 Elite, Xbox 360 S, and the Xbox 360 E. All in all, Microsoft decided that six SKUs were enough for the longest generation in gaming, at least until now. You had the OG, a couple without hard drives, and the slims.



Source link

Previous articleThis Garmin Fenix 7 deal will kickstart your new year fitness goals
Next article7 Reasons Why 2025 Could Redefine Crypto