Xbox explains to FTC judge why Halo isn’t on PlayStation



What you need to know

  • Microsoft is currently battling the FTC in U.S. court over its attempt to buy Activision Blizzard, makers of Call of Duty. 
  • The judge asked why Halo isn’t on PlayStation, in response to discussions about exclusivity in the console market. 
  • Xbox chief Phil Spencer explained why exactly Halo is exclusive, including reducing costs, in addition to maximizing creativity by adhering to one platform. 

Day 2 of the FTC vs. Microsoft hearing rages on. After the FTC called Xbox lead Phil Spencer to the stand, Microsoft had an opportunity to cross-examine. During said time, Judge Corley had opportunities to ask Spencer specific questions or clarify topics. One such question was asked why Halo wasn’t on PlayStation in an effort to understand exclusivity.

Spencer explained that in the console space, all the platforms have exclusive games that don’t launch on other platforms. “We’re at a significant deficit behind the hit quality and number of exclusive games.” He also stated that “Halo is much smaller than Call of Duty, Starfield is much smaller than Minecraft.” in an attempt to describe the difference in scale of these games.





Source link

Previous articleBitcoin price hits its highest level in a year
Next articleIs Twitter ready for Europe's new Big Tech rules? EU official says it … – Cleburne Times-Review