The company was forced to justify its behavior and how its system works after a small-scale publisher started a walkthrough about how large corporate publishers were manipulating the company’s Review System Algorithm and getting away with the act.
The accusations delineated how large brands were negatively impacting small-scale publishers that were working independently for months.
The story all began with an article that was titled, ‘How Google Continues to Kill Independent Sites Like Ours’ and this was seen on the HouseFresh webpage. It proved with a lot of evidence how a long list of review sites belonging to corporate entities gamed the firm’s algorithm. They were doing this by producing new perception-linked hands-on reviews of the page that HouseFresh maintains that weren’t real reviews.
Image: Digital Information World – AIgen
It stated how several publishers ranked goods like costly products that the site reviewed and found to be worse in performance than other cheaper alternatives in the market today. They were making use of less energy and needed a shopping $200 per year budget to have purifiers replaced.
Such big brand pages were giving glowing reviews and that might be related to higher costs due to more earnings generated via affiliates. Shockingly, they proved how product images were also variable from what bigger brands were showing, despite being sources from similar photographers at similar locations. This strongly proved how individual publishers didn’t review the products in detail.
Another serious detail had to do with the insistence of how instances linked to Google displaying preferences made to fake reviews was also running large. The website rolls out a partial list featuring some low-quality reviews in this regard.
This proved how Google’s algorithm is involved in plenty of hanky panky behavior and small websites rolling out honest reviews tend to lose traffic under such waves of the latest algorithms out there today.
On Tuesday, Google even generated responses for X and how it takes such accusations very seriously. They delineated how the company does not carry out any kind of manual checks for website claims. In the same way, their algorithm does not make use of phrases created to implant hands-on reviews for ranking signals.
Their search head has decided to pass the matter on to the whole Search team with thoughts about showing diversity in results entailing big and small publications.
The article suggested how they take part in manual checkups for page claims but the search engine giant refuted that statement. They stated how making claims speaking about the testing process and following checklists is not the best guarantee for top rankings of assuming the page would perform better.
The news comes at a time when Google was seen to be outranking Reddit above the site that made the accusations. We captured some screenshots that show (for US searches) the leading social media forum outranked the real website that produced the allegations made for the article.
The complaints made against Google are certainly not something new. They continue to field more complaints about bigger websites outranking smaller ones for decades. Ironically, we’re seeing a former member of Google post nearly 10 years back how site owners were putting out examples of smaller places that must be ranking better.
While the claims are correct, it’s not always the case but in those where the content appears to be better and therefore gets a higher ranking.
Google is currently playing it smart and safe by blaming it on diversity and how its target is to produce all kinds of results across the board, entailing both big and small names in the publishing industry.
They feel that if smaller sites are certainly being outranked, then it should not be that way. The content that is the best needs to outrank all others, not depending on which source it comes from. Above all, it needs to be regardless of size and they hope to achieve the target soon.
Read next: Top Scams In 2024 To Look Out For
